Three proofs of method
Model, drawing, and site discussion show different levels of decision.
Model
Volumes, access, and relationship to site.
Study
Plans and options before decisions.
Built work
Document the delivered project and context.
Architects, drafters, engineering offices, and construction consultants.Template preview
Meyandy Plan Studio
Decide on paper before correcting on site.
01 / 0301Meyandy Plan Studio
02Model
03Study
Clearly separated engagements
A standard plan, facade review, and full engagement do not carry the same responsibilities.
Preliminary study
Constraints, program, siting, and first options.
Design review
Critical review of an existing file before commitment.
Project support
Milestones, deliverables, and responsibilities defined by contract.
Four decisions before construction
The process shows what needs approval and by whom.
1
Program
Uses, areas, budget, and constraints.
2
Siting
Access, orientation, and land relationship.
3
System
Structure, envelope, and services to coordinate.
4
Documentation
Documents and permits according to context.
The plan is a coordination tool
Every discussion should leave a dated decision, an owner, and an updated file.
What the project file should state
Demonstration project: replace plans, areas, location, fees, and regulatory responsibilities.
Written
Scope
Included deliverables.
Dated
Milestones
Expected decisions.
Clear
Responsibility
Roles of each party.
Which decision do you need to reach?
Share land, program, budget, timing, and available documents.